|
|
|
Kamil Langa, Pavel Kubátb,
Jiří Mosingera,c Vladimír Králd, Pavel Lhotákd,
and Dana M. Wagnerováa |
|
|
|
|
|
a Institute of Inorganic Chemistry,
AS CR, 250 68 Řež, Czech Republic |
|
b J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical
Chemistry, AS CR, 182 23 Praha 8, |
|
Czech
Republic |
|
c Faculty of Sciences, Charles
University, Hlavova 2030, 128 43 Praha 2, |
|
Czech
Republic |
|
d Institute of Chemical Technology,
Technická 5, 166 28 Praha 6, Czech Republic |
|
|
|
|
|
Water-Soluble Porphyrins: |
|
Cationic: meso-tetrakis(4-N-methylpyridyl)porphyrin
(TMPyP) |
|
Anionic: meso-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin
(TPPS) |
|
Neutral: meso-fluorophenylporphyrin-bcyclodextrin
conjugate |
|
|
|
Hosts: |
|
p-sulfonatocalix[X]arene; X = 4, 6, 8 |
|
b-cyclodextrin, 2-hydroxypropyl-cyclodextrins |
|
|
|
|
|
photophysical characterization of the porphyrin
complexes (electrostatic vs. hydrophobic interactions) |
|
how complexation effects the physico-chemical
and photophysical properties of the porphyrins ? |
|
characterization of photoinduced intramolecular
electron/energy processes within the porphyrin complexes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
good solubility in water |
|
low aggregation tendency in aqueous solutions |
|
fluorescence quenching of porphyrin emission
after addition of quinones (benzoquinone, anthraquinone-2-sulfonate) |
|
association constants between quinones and the b-CD cavity
were calculated from the Stern-Volmer plots: Kb ~ 103
M-1 |
|
|
|
|
Sulfonatocalixarenes and cyclodextrins display
different affinity for cationic and anionic porphyrins. The binding
constants for the formation of the complexes TMPyP/CD,
TMPyP/sulfonatocalixarene and TPPS/CD range between 103-105
M-1. |
|
|
|
The electrostatic nature of the interaction
between TMPyP and calixarene is well visualized by comparison of complexing
properties and effects of ionic strength. |
|
|
|
The effects of complexation on Ffluo,
FT and lifetimes of the triplet states of the porphyrins
depend on the size and the type of the receptor cavity. The comple-xation
with calixarenes leads to considerable decrease of FT
while interaction with cyclodextrins does not. This is due to different
binding modes, i.e. Coulombic attraction for calixarenes and hydrophobic
interactions for inclusion |
|
complexes of the porphyrins with CD. |
|
|
|
Sulfonatocalixarenes and cyclodextrins serve as
hosts for binding redox active compounds. This arrangement leads to
photoinduced electron transfer between the porphyrin in the excited singlet
state and the electron acceptors. |
|